<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>digital guerrilla &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com</link>
	<description>writing/movies/technology/life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>state of my ire</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2010/01/28/state-of-my-ire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2010/01/28/state-of-my-ire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/?p=1489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is what happens though when I listen to too much NPR and dip just a toe back into the political blogosphere. Republicians: Until you accept responsibility for taking a budget surplus and creating a budget deficit from it, I&#8217;m not listening to a single word you say about fiscal responsibility My fiancee has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is what happens though when I listen to too much NPR and dip just a toe back into the political blogosphere.</p>
<p>Republicians:<br />
Until you accept responsibility for taking a budget surplus and creating a budget deficit from it, I&#8217;m not listening to a single word you say about fiscal responsibility</p>
<p>My fiancee has no health care not because she thinks she&#8217;s invincible, but because she can&#8217;t afford it.  The problem doesn&#8217;t lie with how much she makes, but with how expensive health care costs are (like the $75 we were charged for a doctor to look at the results of a $300+ test, not to talk to her about it just to look at the paper sent back to him from a lab).  Do something about that.</p>
<p>Back to the deficit for a minute, a big part of where it came from (since your memories don&#8217;t seem to go past last January) was the Medicare prescription drug plan you enacted and didn&#8217;t pay for.  Sure Obama&#8217;s spending freeze will only affect a small percent of the deficit, that&#8217;s because the biggest part of it is health care related.</p>
<p>Right now, I&#8217;m still assuming you do want to do what&#8217;s right for the people, but based on all I&#8217;ve seen and heard from you, you don&#8217;t want the Democrats and specifically Obama to get any credit so you&#8217;re doing everything you can to drag your feet and ensure they fail so you can be back in power and then you&#8217;ll actually do something.  No.  We need you to act now.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democrats:<br />
You weren&#8217;t elected to work with Republicans.  You were elected because we didn&#8217;t like what they were doing and wanted to give you a chance.  So do something already.  Even if you lost eight more Senate seats you would still have a majority.  Make them filibuster.</p>
<p>See what I said above about health care.</p>
<p>One one hand we hear Clinton proclaiming internet access a human right and on the other we have <del datetime="2010-01-28T12:39:56+00:00">Music and Movie Industry Lawyers</del> the Justice Department saying that even an accusation of online copyright infringement should result in being banned from the internet.</p>
<p>Repeal all the laws enacted over the past eight years giving the executive branch the power to violate our rights.</p>
<p>Nice job on the State of the Union, Obama.</p>
<p>Tea Partiers and Fox &#8220;News&#8221;:<br />
Where were your protests when Bush and the Republicans created the deficit?  Oh that&#8217;s right, back then questioning the president was un-American.  Sure Obama has added to it, but part of that addition gave me (and most Tea Party attendees and probably none of the Fox &#8220;News&#8221; hosts) a tax cut.  Yes, Obama&#8217;s evil stimulus package put more money in your pocket.  Go back and check your pay stubs.</p>
<p>The census? Really? That&#8217;s how the government is going to gather information on you so they can round you up?  Thanks to Bush and the Republicans, Obama has the authority to listen in on all of your phone calls and read everything you post online.  He doesn&#8217;t need the census.  If he hadn&#8217;t nixed it, he&#8217;d also have the power to declare you an unlawful enemy combatant, lock you up, and throw away the key and you&#8217;d have no recourse to challenge that decision.  Fight that fight, not the census.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>I could go on and on, but I have better things to do (like write up my thoughts on the iPad).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2010/01/28/state-of-my-ire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>teabagging</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/04/16/teabagging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/04/16/teabagging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/?p=1283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all our teabagging friends, where the f*** was your fiscal conservative outrage over the past 8 years as the president and congress you elected and re-elected took us from a surplus of $128 billion to a deficit of $1.8 trillion? And if you&#8217;re from Georgia and just voted to re-elect one of the two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all our teabagging friends, where the f*** was your fiscal conservative outrage over the past 8 years as the president and congress you elected and re-elected took us from a surplus of $128 billion to a deficit of $1.8 trillion? And if you&#8217;re from Georgia and just voted to re-elect one of the two senators who helped drive the budget off a cliff, sit down and shut up, especially with all of this talk about &#8220;no representation&#8221;. I&#8217;m the one without congressional representation (now that I&#8217;ve moved out to John Linder&#8217;s district).</p>
<p>And where was your fear that your freedoms were being taken away when Bush decided, backed up by Congress, that the president could declare anyone, including you, an unlawful enemy combatant and then imprison you for life without recourse? When he decided that the Fourth Amendment and the laws enacted by Congress in support thereof can be ignored? When he decided that your First Amendment right could be curtailed and confined to special Free Speech Zones? When he decided that the military could be used as a police force in the U.S. without any regard to any restrictions in the Bill of Rights?</p>
<p>If Bush were still president he could have sent the military to your tea parties, declared you all unlawful enemy combatants and sent you to Gitmo for the rest of your lives.  Not any more though. Bush restored posse comitatus on his way out the door and Obama has dismissed the unlawful enemy combatant designation. True Obama has continued to fight to keep the illegal wiretapping and surveillance laws. But then that doesn&#8217;t seem to be why you&#8217;re protesting.</p>
<p>In fact, why are you protesting? Is it because you make over $150,000 and so haven&#8217;t just gotten a tax cut? Is it because you slept through the election day last November and so missed out on your chance to vote (and don&#8217;t realize that there is another federal election next year)? Is it because you didn&#8217;t think to contact your <a href="https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml">representatives</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm">senators</a> and <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/">the president</a> with an alternative plan to deal with the economic crisis?</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>A mostly unrelated addendum. Cries are starting to go out about how if defense spending goes down, we will be less safe. Apparently the only way to keep us safe is to throw money at the Pentagon. Whereas every year public education is told that they don&#8217;t need more money or even the same money as the previous year, they just need to spend a smaller amount of money better. Because if public education spending goes down it certainly won&#8217;t make us less smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/04/16/teabagging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>to the next four years</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/01/20/to-the-next-four-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/01/20/to-the-next-four-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s hoping it won&#8217;t be quite as long a walk home as expected. As Springsteen put it: You know that flag flying over the courthouse Means certain things are set in stone Who we are, what we&#8217;ll do and what we won&#8217;t. We may have lost our way, done some of those things we wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s hoping it won&#8217;t be quite as long a walk home as expected.  As Springsteen put it:</p>
<blockquote><p>You know that flag flying over the courthouse<br />
Means certain things are set in stone<br />
Who we are, what we&#8217;ll do and what we won&#8217;t.</p></blockquote>
<p>We may have lost our way, done some of those things we wouldn&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t do (such as forgetting that we were founded on the idea that all Men, regardless of nationality, are endowed with inalienable rights), but we&#8217;re about to take that first big step on the road home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2009/01/20/to-the-next-four-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>land of hope and dreams</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/10/10/land-of-hope-and-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/10/10/land-of-hope-and-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/10/10/land-of-hope-and-dreams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Springsteen&#8217;s speech from the first of three free concerts for Obama: I&#8217;ve spent most of my creative life measuring the distance between that American promise and American reality. For many Americans, who are today losing their jobs, their homes, seeing their retirement funds disappear, who have no healthcare, or who have been abandoned in our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Springsteen&#8217;s speech from the first of three free concerts for Obama:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usRHgEXD0Ss">I&#8217;ve spent most of my creative life measuring the distance between that American promise and American reality. For many Americans, who are today losing their jobs, their homes, seeing their retirement funds disappear, who have no healthcare, or who have been abandoned in our inner cities, the distance between that promise, and that reality, has never been greater or more painful.</a></p></blockquote>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/usRHgEXD0Ss&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/usRHgEXD0Ss&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p>The whole set in Philidelphia can be seen <a href="http://cbs3.com/video/?id=65837@kyw.dayport.com">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/10/10/land-of-hope-and-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>voting shenanigans in 2002?</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/07/18/voting-shenanigans-in-2002/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/07/18/voting-shenanigans-in-2002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/07/18/voting-shenanigans-in-2002/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should be big news as it comes in part from a former McCain advisor, but alleges possible election fixing in favor of Republicans, Senator Saxby Chambliss and Governor Sonny Perdue: In discussions with RAW STORY, the whistleblower &#8212; who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation &#8212; said that he became suspicious of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be big news as it comes in part from a former McCain advisor, but alleges possible election fixing in favor of Republicans, Senator Saxby Chambliss and Governor Sonny Perdue:</p>
<blockquote><p>In discussions with RAW STORY, the whistleblower &#8212; who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation &#8212; said that he became suspicious of Diebold&#8217;s actions in Georgia for two reasons. The first red flag went up when the computer patch was installed in person by Diebold CEO Bob Urosevich, who flew in from Texas and applied it in just two counties, DeKalb and Fulton, both Democratic strongholds.</p></blockquote>
<p>(<a href="http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Cybersecurity_expert_raises_allegations_of_2004_0717.html">Raw Story</a> via <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/spytalk/2008/07/report-voting-machines-tampere.html">SpyTalk</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/07/18/voting-shenanigans-in-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>and it&#8217;s funny too</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/05/08/and-its-funny-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/05/08/and-its-funny-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/05/08/and-its-funny-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give you the results of a Pew Research Center&#8217;s Project for Excellence in Journalism survey of a year of The Daily Show, which state, shockingly to all of us I&#8217;m sure, that: The program&#8217;s clearest focus is politics, especially in Washington. U.S. foreign affairs, largely dominated by the Bush Administration&#8217;s policies in Iraq, Washington [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give you <a href="http://www.journalism.org/node/10953">the results of a Pew Research Center&#8217;s Project for Excellence in Journalism survey of a year of The Daily Show</a>, which state, shockingly to all of us I&#8217;m sure, that:</p>
<blockquote><p>The program&#8217;s clearest focus is politics, especially in Washington. U.S. foreign affairs, largely dominated by the Bush Administration&#8217;s policies in Iraq, Washington politics and government accounted for nearly half (47%) of the time spent on the program. Overall, The Daily Show news agenda is quite close to those of cable news talk shows.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some other very interesting results there which you may also find (not) so surprising. (<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003800882">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/05/08/and-its-funny-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>nepal is not tibet</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/04/14/nepal-is-not-tibet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/04/14/nepal-is-not-tibet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/04/14/nepal-is-not-tibet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Driving home I was listening to This Week and, as usual, spent much of the time arguing with the people on it. Normally I don&#8217;t share because, well, the day has not yet been invented which has enough hours for that. This time though, George Stephanopoulos (oh how I miss Sam Donaldson&#8217;s gusto in pronouncing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driving home I was listening to This Week and, as usual, spent much of the time arguing with the people on it. Normally I don&#8217;t share because, well, the day has not yet been invented which has enough hours for that. This time though, George Stephanopoulos (oh how I miss Sam Donaldson&#8217;s gusto in pronouncing that name) questioned our National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley about Bush&#8217;s possible attendance at the Olympic Opening Ceremonies, which leaders from several countries will be boycotting. Six times during the interview Hadley referred to the controversy surrounding &#8220;Nepal&#8221;. Once, I&#8217;d laugh it off. I&#8217;d even let it go twice, heck, I&#8217;d be generous and let three demonstrations of utterly embarrassing ignorance from one of the top members of the State Department slide. Six times though without once recognizing that you mean Tibet? That&#8217;s enough to make me boil over.</p>
<p>He was not corrected any of those times of course (though in the write up online, &#8220;sic&#8221; was at least inserted following each mention). He also did a masterful job of not answering the direct question of whether or not Bush would attend the ceremonies, implying though that he would.</p>
<p>And since I&#8217;m on it anyway, Jimmy Carter, questioned about the comparison with our boycott of the 1980 Olympics said the situation was not the same at all. Back then it was because a country&#8217;s military had just started to invade a sovereign nation. The difference being apparently that the sovereign nation of Tibet was completely invaded by another country&#8217;s military over 50 years ago. Who cares about something that happened that far in the past?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/04/14/nepal-is-not-tibet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/24/perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/24/perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/24/perspective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big Iraq war news of the day seems to be that the death toll of American soldiers has reached 4,000. I expect soon to hear from certain quarters how this milestone signifies the devastating nature of the war and how we must withdraw immediately. Here&#8217;s a little perspective on just how &#8220;horrendous&#8221; that casualty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big Iraq war news of the day seems to be that the death toll of American soldiers has reached 4,000. I expect soon to hear from certain quarters how this milestone signifies the devastating nature of the war and how we must withdraw immediately. Here&#8217;s a little perspective on just how &#8220;horrendous&#8221; that casualty figure really is:</p>
<p>We fought for less than two years in World War I and lost 116,708 soldiers<br />During the four years of our involvement in World War II we lost 416,800 soldiers<br />We fought in Korea for three years and lost 36,516 brave souls<br />For the first five years of major combat operations in Vietnam (1964-1969) 35,957 men and women gave their lives.</p>
<p>So the loss of 4,000 soldiers during five years of fighting makes this war the least deadly war we&#8217;ve fought in the last 100 years (and a quick look further back reveals that it may be second only to the War of 1812 overall).</p>
<p>UPDATE: As current reports focus on the death toll, I did, as noted in a comment, leave out the wounded figures. To give the more complete perspective, let&#8217;s look at those too.</p>
<p>Currently in Iraq, 29,451 Americans have been wounded (more than half of whom returned to duty within three days).<br />In World War I, 204,002 were wounded.<br />For World War II, the figure rose to 671,846.<br />In Korea, 103,284 suffered non-fatal wounds.<br />I can&#8217;t find a year by year breakdown of WIA figures for Vietnam, but averaging out the total number gives us about 85,168 for five years.</p>
<p>So the number of wounded over five years is also significantly less than any major conflict of the past century and the ratio of deaths to wounded is significantly greater (1:7.3 versus the previous high of the Korean war 1:2.8).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/24/perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>who watches the watchers? almost no one</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/21/who-watches-the-watchers-almost-no-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/21/who-watches-the-watchers-almost-no-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/21/who-watches-the-watchers-almost-no-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a big domestic intelligence conference held in San Francisco this week. The Wired blog Threat Level has an almost exclusive writeup of it. Almost exclusive because A total of three reporters showed up over two days to hear from officials such as Leonard Boyle who runs the Terrorist Screening Center, Charlie Allen &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a big domestic intelligence conference held in San Francisco this week. The Wired blog <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/03/feds-tout-new-d.html">Threat Level has an almost exclusive writeup of it</a>. Almost exclusive because</p>
<blockquote><p>A total of three reporters showed up over two days to hear from officials such as Leonard Boyle who runs the Terrorist Screening Center, Charlie Allen &#8212; the chief intelligence officer for the Department of Homeland Security, and Los Angeles police chief William Bratton. THREAT LEVEL was the only media outlet to show up two days running, and neither of San Francisco&#8217;s dailies sent a reporter.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/21/who-watches-the-watchers-almost-no-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>was it too obvious?</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/20/was-it-too-obvious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/20/was-it-too-obvious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/20/was-it-too-obvious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I kept telling myself that I should write down these thoughts, but then I&#8217;d remind myself of how obvious they are and surely someone would get around to pointing them out. Here we are a week later and it&#8217;s just now that I see someone point how if Pat Robertson had said what Reverend Wright [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept telling myself that I should write down these thoughts, but then I&#8217;d remind myself of how obvious they are and surely someone would get around to pointing them out. Here we are a week later and it&#8217;s just now that I see <a href="http://suicidegirls.com/news/politics/23051/">someone point how if Pat Robertson had said what Reverend Wright said, it would have been a non-issue</a> (note: that&#8217;s from the SuicideGirls newsfeed so the link may not be work safe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digital-guerrilla.com/archives/2008/03/20/was-it-too-obvious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.402 seconds -->

